The decision by the UK House of Commons not to support any intervention in Syria
looks more enlightened by the day as the so called 'rebels' we would have been
supporting now appear to be the self same ISIS 'terrorists' that US this week
started to launch airstrikes against in Iraq.
Why the US and Britain are still looking to get involved in Iraq/Syria is
beyond me. All Western intervention in this region is entirely counterproductive.
And who exactly are we supporting anyway? It's about time the Western powers
took a step back and left it to the various warring factions on the ground to
reach their own solutions about how to live together. This may indeed mean
sitting on the sidelines as a humanitarian crisis evolves. It may mean that an
Islamic state comes to power in the region. It may even mean that Iraq ultimately splits
into 3 different countries. However, if there is ever to be a lasting peace the
only way it will happen is if the various sides on the ground reach their own accommodations.
Western intervention achieves nothing except creating more resentment and
hatred for us across the region.
I notice today that the UK has now deployed RAF Tornado jets to provide
greater surveillance of northern Iraq and protect the 'humanitarian' mission!
These jets have the capability of launching air strikes so why hasn't
parliament been recalled to sanction their use? And what remit do they actually
have? We know the SAS is already engaged on the ground and today the
possibility of further UK ground troops being deployed at a later date was also
not ruled out by Phillip Hammond. Is the UK government getting us deeper
engaged in this conflict by stealth? Certainly after the Syria vote, David
Cameron cannot afford another defeat in parliament regarding intervention in
the region. So is that why we are now seeing a bypassing of parliament and UK forces being
engaged under the auspicious of a 'humanitarian' mission! I'm sorry, but,
Tornado jets and the SAS don't signal a humanitarian mission to me - it signals
intervention. So we're back in Iraq and who's to say the remit to battle ISIS
won't also get us into Syria? Recall parliament now! We need a vote on this
before the UK gets any deeper into the conflict.
And then there is Israel. An apartheid state, as bad as the apartheid regime
in South Africa, who the Western powers seem to be completely turning a blind
eye to. Again the issue in this region will never be solved so long as the US
continues to provide unconditional support to Israel. Gaza is a prison camp and
the current conflict is just another in a series of Israel culls of the Palestinian
population. It is nothing short of ethnic cleansing and it is disgusting. It's
time to expel the Israeli ambassador to the UK, boycott Israeli goods, and
remove all UK support for the current regime. The only way forward in this
region is a one state solution with equal rights for all and an end to any
official state religion. This is what the US and the Western powers should be
pushing both sides towards.
Britain has played a large role historically in creating the problems in the
middle east. It now needs to take a step back and think very carefully about
how it uses its influence from the sidelines in a more just and equitable
manner. The government needs to listen to the UK population who have zero
desire to see the country engaged in any further conflicts in the region and
who also are clearly calling for a change in government policy towards the
apartheid regime in Israel.
Wake up UK! We need a change in policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment